Difference between revisions of "CDC Social Media Tools, Guidelines & Best Practices"
From LINKS Community Center
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
https://safetyinnovationcenter.sharepoint.com/:b:/r/sites/LINKS_shared/Freigegebene%20Dokumente/WP4/Guidelines/Guideline%20Documents/Working%20documents/Action%20cards/G18_SOCIAL%20MEDIA%20EVALUATION%20WORKSHEET.pdf | https://safetyinnovationcenter.sharepoint.com/:b:/r/sites/LINKS_shared/Freigegebene%20Dokumente/WP4/Guidelines/Guideline%20Documents/Working%20documents/Action%20cards/G18_SOCIAL%20MEDIA%20EVALUATION%20WORKSHEET.pdf | ||
|Is Archived=No | |Is Archived=No | ||
+ | |Data Sources=Facebook, Twitter | ||
|Primary Target Group=Practitioners, Citizens | |Primary Target Group=Practitioners, Citizens | ||
|Covers Usage Of=Social Media | |Covers Usage Of=Social Media |
Revision as of 13:41, 2 September 2022
Created: 3 February 2022
Last edited: 9 August 2023
Last edited: 9 August 2023
Quick Facts
Publishing Organisation:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)Year:
2019Primary Target Country:
United States of AmericaLanguages:
EnglishStatus:
PublishedCovers Thematic
Target audience
Audience experience level
Disaster Management Phase
Synopsis
No synopsis provided.
Linked to
- Technologies
- Use Cases
-
None. See all Technologies.
- None. See all Use Cases.
A set of 6 documents results in a comprehensive guideline for the use of social media in emergencies. Using best practice examples (Facebook (https://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/facebook-guidelines.html) and Twitter (https://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia/tools/guidelines/twitter.html) ), the difference between good and bad publications in social media is shown.