Warning and Informing Scotland: Difference between revisions
From LINKS Community Center
Dinu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dinu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
**Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, YouTube, Flickr | **Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, YouTube, Flickr | ||
*'''Level 2 – Passive Monitoring''' | |||
* Description | |||
** Passive monitoring of social media content. | |||
* Advantages | |||
** Allows you to understand audience perceptions and opinions. | |||
** Enables identification of key stakeholders/influencers in communities which can support message dissemination. | |||
** Builds understanding of demographics for social media platforms. | |||
* Used for | |||
** Static monitoring for specific events to gather information and increase situational awareness. | |||
** Evaluating impact of campaigns and messages. | |||
** Assessing how your organisation is viewed by the public. | |||
* Potential risks | |||
** The purpose of social media engagement needs to be made clear to users, otherwise there could be a mismatch between their expectations and the service provided. | |||
*** This is a reputational risk. | |||
* Platforms | |||
** Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Flickr, LinkedIn | |||
*'''Level 3 – Active Public Engagement''' | |||
* Description | |||
** Disseminating information and engaging in two-way communication with your audience (responding to questions, comments, etc). | |||
* Advantages | |||
** Makes an organisation more accessible and responsive to the public. | |||
** Allows you to inform and shape public perceptions. | |||
** Reducing the impact of misinformation through timely response to ill-informed comments. | |||
* Used for | |||
** Providing direct information/ advice for non-critical events. | |||
** Seeking information from the public, e.g. eye-witness reports. | |||
** Countering misinformation and rumours. | |||
** Providing community reassurance. | |||
* Potential risks | |||
** It is essential to have clear guidelines on rules of engagement. | |||
** Volume of information requests might be very high during certain situations so procedures need to be in place to deal with this. | |||
* Platforms | |||
** Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Flickr, Instagram | |||
Line 92: | Line 125: | ||
https://safetyinnovationcenter.sharepoint.com/:b:/r/sites/LINKS_shared/Freigegebene%20Dokumente/WP4/Guidelines/Guideline%20Documents/Working%20documents/Action%20cards/G07_Social%20Media%20Platforms%20to%20use_extrac_%20level2.pdf | https://safetyinnovationcenter.sharepoint.com/:b:/r/sites/LINKS_shared/Freigegebene%20Dokumente/WP4/Guidelines/Guideline%20Documents/Working%20documents/Action%20cards/G07_Social%20Media%20Platforms%20to%20use_extrac_%20level2.pdf | ||
|Is Archived=No | |Is Archived=No | ||
|Data Sources=Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter | |Data Sources=Facebook, Flickr, YouTube, Twitter, LinkedIn | ||
|Disaster Management Phase=Before, During, After | |Disaster Management Phase=Before, During, After | ||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 13:59, 31 January 2023
Created: 9 December 2021
Last edited: 31 January 2023
Last edited: 31 January 2023
Quick Facts
Publishing Organisation:
Ready ScotlandYear:
2018Primary Target Country:
ScotlandLanguages:
EnglishStatus:
PublishedCovers Thematic
Target audience
Audience experience level
Disaster Management Phase
Synopsis
Note: Synopsiss taken from a previous edition
INCREASING YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA PRESENCE
A social media presence will significantly enhance your communications strategy before, during and after an emergency. An effective social media strategy will incorporate the critical elements of:
Listening – Talking – Engaging – Sustaining
- Listening
- What are people talking about?
- What is being said about your organization/subject matter?
- Who is your audience?
- Where is your audience?
- Talking
- Promote and introduce your organization/subject matter
- Provide information that will be helpful
- Target influential individuals/audiences
- Engaging
- Develop and encourage two-way conversations
- Talk with supporters and critics
- Create a growing network using content that can be shared
- Sustaining
- Keep dialogue going to be well positioned in an emergency
- Commit necessary resources to maintain momentum
- Turn followers into advocates who speak for you
COMMUNICATING WITH THE PUBLIC - CONTENTS
- Public Communications Groups (PCG)
- Activation and composition
- Engagement with a Resilience Partnership
- Out of hours
- National decision-making
- The Scottish Government
- Principles
- Clear roles and responsibilities
- Provision of communication advice at every level of decision making
- Clear communication objectives
- An audience-based approach
- An understanding of channels, and adaption to new opportunities
- Use of dedicated spokespeople
- Phased communications
- Planning
- Preparing the public
- Preparing the Public Communications Group
- Response
- Activation
- First hour public communications
- Beyond the first hour
- Recovery
LEVEL OF SOCIAL MEDIA INTEGRATION
- Level 1 – Information Dissemination
- Description
- Using platforms only to disseminate information.
- Advantages
- Organisations can control dissemination of their content on the channel and decide what content should be shared and when.
- Information with the public can be shared instantaneously, increasing your audience.
- Potential to reach a wider audience than other broadcast channels.
- Used for
- Warning and informing the public Campaigning
- Community Engagement
- Potential risks
- If organisations establish themselves as a trusted source, an organisation’s failure to maintain their channels may result in parts of the population being less informed.
- Platforms
- Twitter, Facebook, Linkedin, YouTube, Flickr
- Level 2 – Passive Monitoring
- Description
- Passive monitoring of social media content.
- Advantages
- Allows you to understand audience perceptions and opinions.
- Enables identification of key stakeholders/influencers in communities which can support message dissemination.
- Builds understanding of demographics for social media platforms.
- Used for
- Static monitoring for specific events to gather information and increase situational awareness.
- Evaluating impact of campaigns and messages.
- Assessing how your organisation is viewed by the public.
- Potential risks
- The purpose of social media engagement needs to be made clear to users, otherwise there could be a mismatch between their expectations and the service provided.
- This is a reputational risk.
- The purpose of social media engagement needs to be made clear to users, otherwise there could be a mismatch between their expectations and the service provided.
- Platforms
- Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Flickr, LinkedIn
- Level 3 – Active Public Engagement
- Description
- Disseminating information and engaging in two-way communication with your audience (responding to questions, comments, etc).
- Advantages
- Makes an organisation more accessible and responsive to the public.
- Allows you to inform and shape public perceptions.
- Reducing the impact of misinformation through timely response to ill-informed comments.
- Used for
- Providing direct information/ advice for non-critical events.
- Seeking information from the public, e.g. eye-witness reports.
- Countering misinformation and rumours.
- Providing community reassurance.
- Potential risks
- It is essential to have clear guidelines on rules of engagement.
- Volume of information requests might be very high during certain situations so procedures need to be in place to deal with this.
- Platforms
- Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Flickr, Instagram
Please note: Previous edition available on the project's servers
Linked to
- Technologies
- Use Cases
-
None. See all Technologies.
- None. See all Use Cases.