Crisis Mapping and Crowdsourcing in Flood Management: Difference between revisions
From LINKS Community Center
Dinu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Dinu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
- Recent natural disasters have shown that volunteered information, provided through the Internet, can improve situational awareness by providing an overview of the present situation. This is because VGI offers a great opportunity to raise awareness due to the potentially large number of volunteers – more than six billion people – who can potentially act as “sensors”, recording important parameters for disaster management in a local environment. | - Recent natural disasters have shown that volunteered information, provided through the Internet, can improve situational awareness by providing an overview of the present situation. This is because VGI offers a great opportunity to raise awareness due to the potentially large number of volunteers – more than six billion people – who can potentially act as “sensors”, recording important parameters for disaster management in a local environment. | ||
'''Benefits and Potentialities''' | |||
* Magnitude | * Magnitude | ||
o Compared to traditional media and the manner in which news is disseminated, social media are able to create a dense network of observers who are able to rapidly publish and share information. This is a powerful tool for crisis communication. The benefit of social media for crisis management is that it is created by a crowd and available to all. Rapid sharing of information would not be possible without such openness | o Compared to traditional media and the manner in which news is disseminated, social media are able to create a dense network of observers who are able to rapidly publish and share information. This is a powerful tool for crisis communication. The benefit of social media for crisis management is that it is created by a crowd and available to all. Rapid sharing of information would not be possible without such openness | ||
Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
o Information technologies – and crowdsourcing tools and platforms in particular – can help in filling the gap of the limited statehood, enhancing the available resources and interpersonal relations already existing at the local level | o Information technologies – and crowdsourcing tools and platforms in particular – can help in filling the gap of the limited statehood, enhancing the available resources and interpersonal relations already existing at the local level | ||
'''Limits''' | |||
* Data validity | * Data validity | ||
o Authentication of information is crucial because of the obvious risks associated with an unregulated stream of information, especially as it | o Authentication of information is crucial because of the obvious risks associated with an unregulated stream of information, especially as it |
Revision as of 13:51, 15 September 2022
Created: 3 December 2021
Last edited: 30 January 2023
Last edited: 30 January 2023
Quick Facts
Publishing Organisation:
Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM)Year:
2017Languages:
EnglishStatus:
PublishedCovers Thematic
Target audience
Audience experience level
Disaster Management Phase
Synopsis
No synopsis provided.
Linked to
- Technologies
- Use Cases
-
None. See all Technologies.
- None. See all Use Cases.
Guidance material for practitioners on how to use crowdsourcing-applications for the preparation of an incoming flood, during a flood and facing the aftermath. It also includes the presentation of some popular crisis-mapping networks and platforms, to show readers a wide range of opportunities and instruments that could be included in their use. Examples for successful crowdsourcing activities: PAKISTAN FLOOD (2010);QUEENSLAND AND VICTORIA FLOOD (AUSTRALIA, 2010/2011);JAKARTA FLOODS (INDONESIA);UTTARAKHAND FLOOD INDIA, 2013);COLORADO FLOOD (USA, 2013);ELBE RIVER FLOOD (GERMANY, 2013);EBRO RIVER FLOOD – ZARAGOZA (SPAIN, 2015)