Crisis Mapping and Crowdsourcing in Flood Management: Difference between revisions
From LINKS Community Center
Dinu (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tag: visualeditor |
Dinu (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''Collaborative production of knowledge, volunteered geographic information, crowdsourcing in crisis-mapping:''' | '''Collaborative production of knowledge, volunteered geographic information, crowdsourcing in crisis-mapping:''' | ||
* | * <u>''Crowdsourcing''</u> | ||
- The term crowdsourcing refers to a way of organizing the work, which involves an information system to coordinate and monitor tasks performed by people. Moreover, this term can be understood as a production model where the intelligence and knowledge of volunteers are used to solve problems, create content and develop new technologies. Volunteers performing a specific task, such as environmental monitoring, collectively make a citizen observatory (CO), where data can be collected, collated and published. | - The term crowdsourcing refers to a way of organizing the work, which involves an information system to coordinate and monitor tasks performed by people. Moreover, this term can be understood as a production model where the intelligence and knowledge of volunteers are used to solve problems, create content and develop new technologies. Volunteers performing a specific task, such as environmental monitoring, collectively make a citizen observatory (CO), where data can be collected, collated and published. | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
|Disaster Community Technologies Elaboration=This document describes the different type of sources for crowdsourcing and the use of technologies based on well-known practise tools | |Disaster Community Technologies Elaboration=This document describes the different type of sources for crowdsourcing and the use of technologies based on well-known practise tools | ||
}} | }} | ||
Guidance material for practitioners on how to use crowdsourcing-applications for the preparation of an incoming flood, during a flood and facing the aftermath. It also includes the presentation of some popular crisis-mapping networks and platforms, to show readers a wide range of opportunities and instruments that could be included in their use. | |||
Examples for successful crowdsourcing activities: | Examples for successful crowdsourcing activities: | ||
<small>PAKISTAN FLOOD (2010);QUEENSLAND AND VICTORIA FLOOD (AUSTRALIA, 2010/2011);JAKARTA FLOODS (INDONESIA);UTTARAKHAND FLOOD INDIA, 2013);COLORADO FLOOD (USA, 2013);ELBE RIVER FLOOD (GERMANY, 2013);EBRO RIVER FLOOD – ZARAGOZA (SPAIN, 2015)</small> | <small>PAKISTAN FLOOD (2010);QUEENSLAND AND VICTORIA FLOOD (AUSTRALIA, 2010/2011);JAKARTA FLOODS (INDONESIA);UTTARAKHAND FLOOD INDIA, 2013);COLORADO FLOOD (USA, 2013);ELBE RIVER FLOOD (GERMANY, 2013);EBRO RIVER FLOOD – ZARAGOZA (SPAIN, 2015)</small> |
Revision as of 13:50, 15 September 2022
Created: 3 December 2021
Last edited: 30 January 2023
Last edited: 30 January 2023
Quick Facts
Publishing Organisation:
Associated Programme on Flood Management (APFM)Year:
2017Languages:
EnglishStatus:
PublishedCovers Thematic
Target audience
Audience experience level
Disaster Management Phase
Synopsis
No synopsis provided.
Linked to
- Technologies
- Use Cases
-
None. See all Technologies.
- None. See all Use Cases.
Guidance material for practitioners on how to use crowdsourcing-applications for the preparation of an incoming flood, during a flood and facing the aftermath. It also includes the presentation of some popular crisis-mapping networks and platforms, to show readers a wide range of opportunities and instruments that could be included in their use. Examples for successful crowdsourcing activities: PAKISTAN FLOOD (2010);QUEENSLAND AND VICTORIA FLOOD (AUSTRALIA, 2010/2011);JAKARTA FLOODS (INDONESIA);UTTARAKHAND FLOOD INDIA, 2013);COLORADO FLOOD (USA, 2013);ELBE RIVER FLOOD (GERMANY, 2013);EBRO RIVER FLOOD – ZARAGOZA (SPAIN, 2015)