Social media use in emergency management: Difference between revisions

From LINKS Community Center
Jump to: navigation, search
Cschwentker (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Dinu (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Guideline
{{Guideline
|Publishing Organisation=Clayton Wukich, Cleveland State University
|Language=English
|Language=English
|Year Published=2015
|Year Published=2015
|Target Audience=Researchers
|Target Audience=Researchers
|Status=Published
|Status=Published
|Disaster Management Phase=Preparedness, Response, Recovery
|Covers Thematic=Crisis communication, Crowdsourcing
|Covers Thematic=Social Media, Crowdsourcing
|Audience Experience Level=Intermediate
|Source Website=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281484759_Social_media_use_in_emergency_management
|Source Website=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281484759_Social_media_use_in_emergency_management
|Synopsis=*Issue: To identify and illustrate the range of strategies and tactics available for emergency managers using social media.
*This study uses content analysis of more than 80 related journal articles, research reports, and government documents as well as more than 120 newspaper articles, identified through LexisNexis search queries.
*Three strategies, information dissemination, monitoring real-time data, and engaging the public in a conversation and/or crowdsourcing, are available to emergency managers to augment communication practices via face-to-face contact and through traditional media outlets.
*Academic research has identified several message types disseminated during response operations.
*Message types during other emergency phases have received less attention; however, news reporting and government reports provide best practices and inform this study.
*This article provides the foundation for a more complete typology of emergency management messages. Relatedly, despite limited attention in the academic research, monitoring social media feeds to accrue situational awareness and interacting with others to generate a conversation and/or to coordinate collective action also take place in various forms and are discussed.
*Findings integrate the fragmented body of knowledge into a more coherent whole and suggest that practitioners might maximize outcomes through a three-step process of information dissemination, data monitoring, and the direct engagement of diverse sets of actors to spur risk reduction efforts.
*However, these steps require time, personnel, and resources, which present obstacles for agencies operating under conditions of personnel and resource scarcity.
|Is Archived=No
|Is Archived=No
|Primary Target Group=Researchers
|Covers Usage Of=Social Media, Crowdsourcing
|Covers Disaster Community Technologies=No
}}
}}
For this article, over 200 sources were analyzed with regard to social media strategies used by civil authorities in crisis situations and the knowledge was summarized at a strategy level.

Latest revision as of 12:29, 14 August 2023

Quick Facts

Publishing Organisation:
Clayton Wukich, Cleveland State University
Year:
2015
Languages:
English
Status:
Published
Covers Thematic
  • Crisis communication Crisis communication is a strategic approach to corresponding with people and organizations during a disruptive event. When a crisis occurs, proactive, quick and detailed communication is critical.</br></br></br>Source: www.techtarget.com/searchdisasterrecovery/definition/crisis-communication
  • Crowdsourcing Describes a distributed problem-solving model where the task of solving a challenge or developing an idea get “outsourced” to a crowd. It implies tapping into “the wisdom of the crowd”.</br></br>Source:DRS Glossary v2.0 LINKS 181220.xlsx
  • Target audience
  • Researchers research institutions and scientific communities
  • Audience experience level
  • Intermediate Those who currently use social media to communicate with the public and have developed a draft social media strategy, even if this is not thoroughly documented or communicated across the organisation</br></br>Source: https://www.fp7-emergent.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/20170529_D7.3_Guidelines_to_increase_the_benefit_of_social_media_EmerGent.pdf
  • Disaster Management Phase
    Synopsis
    • Issue: To identify and illustrate the range of strategies and tactics available for emergency managers using social media.
    • This study uses content analysis of more than 80 related journal articles, research reports, and government documents as well as more than 120 newspaper articles, identified through LexisNexis search queries.
    • Three strategies, information dissemination, monitoring real-time data, and engaging the public in a conversation and/or crowdsourcing, are available to emergency managers to augment communication practices via face-to-face contact and through traditional media outlets.
    • Academic research has identified several message types disseminated during response operations.
    • Message types during other emergency phases have received less attention; however, news reporting and government reports provide best practices and inform this study.
    • This article provides the foundation for a more complete typology of emergency management messages. Relatedly, despite limited attention in the academic research, monitoring social media feeds to accrue situational awareness and interacting with others to generate a conversation and/or to coordinate collective action also take place in various forms and are discussed.
    • Findings integrate the fragmented body of knowledge into a more coherent whole and suggest that practitioners might maximize outcomes through a three-step process of information dissemination, data monitoring, and the direct engagement of diverse sets of actors to spur risk reduction efforts.
    • However, these steps require time, personnel, and resources, which present obstacles for agencies operating under conditions of personnel and resource scarcity.

    Linked to